Making Space for Dialogue: Cosmopolitan FYE as a Model for College First-Year Experiences
A work in progress (written for the PPJ New Engaged Scholars program), this paper provides the framework for a college first-year program (designed by the composer) rooted in the philosophy of cosmopolitanism. Spanning across the entire academic year and composed of three strands, Cosmopolitan First-Year Experience emphasizes dialogue and local immersion as forms of practice in civic engagement.
/matrix/www/cppj/public_html/wp-content/themes/Zukra2/utilities/functions.php:500:string 'docx' (length=4)
/matrix/www/cppj/public_html/wp-content/themes/Zukra2/utilities/functions.php:501:string '1117-CosmopolitanFYE_PPJ_Revised.html' (length=37)
FYE can be designed in a variety of ways. Skipper (2017) highlights four common forms: extended orientation, academic seminar with uniform content, academic seminar with varied content, and hybrids (which combine a seminar with components of an extended orientation). The goals and learning outcomes of FYE programs vary from institution to institution, but current scholarship by Kuh and O’Donnell (2013) recognizes eight including practices that encourages “Diversity/Global Learning.” However, in her analysis of data from the 2012-2013 National Survey of First-Year Seminars on the eight HIPs, Skipper (2017) notes that while all the various forms of FYE “provide frameworks and structures that make specific effective educational practices more or less likely to occur” (p. 15), one weakness across the board was in “experiences with diversity.” This was an interesting finding because while 58.8% indicated an intentional incorporation of diversity and global learning experiences, only 4.7% and 3.3% indicated that diversity and global learning (respectively) were important FYE course goals. In regard to this finding, Skipper notes: “
What follows is an outline of these three components and a discussion of the role played by dialogue, formal and informal, within each. (A more detailed description of the program design, including mission, goals, objectives, and scope, may be found at
Barefoot, B. O. (2000). The first-year experience: Are we making it any better? About Campus, 4(6), 12.
Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom : Ethics, democracy, and civic courage (P. Clarke, Trans.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.
Hansen, D. T. (2008). Curriculum and the idea of a cosmopolitan inheritance. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(3), 289-312.
Hansen, D. T. (2011). The teacher and the world: A study of cosmopolitanism as education (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Hunter, M. S. (2006). Fostering student learning and success through first-year programs. Peer Review, 8(3), 4-7.
Kuh, G. D., & O'Donnell, K. (2013). Ensuring quality and taking high-impact practices to scale. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities
Porter, S. R., & Swing, R. a., L. (2006). Understanding how first-year seminars affect persistence. Research in Higher Education(1), 89. doi: 10.1007/s11162-005-8153-6
Rizvi, F. (2009). Towards cosmopolitan learning. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(3), 253-268.
Skipper, T. L. (2017). What makes the first-year seminar high impact? An exploration of effective educational practices. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for The First Year Experience & Students in Transition
March 19, 2018 at 1:14 pm